

I still used the film camera sparingly while visions of digital cameras danced in my head – that was while I was even wide awake! Finally, I could not hold off any longer and took the old photographers’ leap from film to digital SLR. It was after all my birthday, so why not give myself a present. So off to Canoga Camera my wife and I went. The salesperson was indeed friendly and helpful. Of course per recommendation, I chose the Canon 300D kit (which included the 18-55mm lens) then the current rage in digital SLRs. When the salesperson asked which body color I wanted - Silver or Black, and being the Silas Marner that I am, I chose Silver because it costs $20 less. (Bad choice – Silver reflects light and that would surely bother my bird subjects and, besides, Black looks more “professional”). There I went: bad bird photographer right off the bat.
I kept my son’s 70-300 zoom and used that with my 300D for my venture into digital bird photography. The gentleman was right, I could see my shots almost instantly. What it meant was that now it won’t take me a week to find out how bad a bird photographer I was! Somehow I was using my new camera like it was a film camera – that is, I was very selective with my shots as if I do not want to waste any frame with a bad shot. I cannot even use up a 512MB Compact Flash card in a half a day’s session, shooting in jpeg at that! For me the subject must be in a good pose before I click on the shutter button. Now bear in mind that I’m shooting birds, creatures of constant motion. And even when my subject cooperated and posed for a while, the pictures still came out soft (a photography term to indicate that the subject is not sharp, as in the edges are “soft”). The results of my endeavors have been consistently of poor quality. It kept me pondering what could be wrong. Frustration was beginning to nag me.
9 comments:
That Vermilion Flycatcher looks so handsome!
Hi I`d like to tag you for a meme. Please find the details hereHere. Thanks
Very beautiful birds. Nice photos of both of them. :))) Small birds are so difficult to photograph because they are rarely sitting in one place. :)))
I see you photograph your birds in nature rather than at a conveniently nearer feeder. Your photos are still good. It takes a while to get over the 'economy' shooting. Just wait until you develop the shutter finger twitch! I shot off 130 photos the other morning just on a sunrise, mind you it was worth it.
It you are not too happy with soft focus, there are a veriety of programmes like photoshop etc that do a wonderful job for you on the computer.
Just remember, a Nat.Geograhic photograher used to shoot off eight times 36 exposures for one reallly outstanding shot, and take heart!
So much easier with DSLR eh?
Nice works and thanks for dropping by. Keep me posted more...
Who says you are a bad bird photographer!?
TV Tower on Sinhagad - Going Inside Clouds
Hi, thank you very much for the help
Fringilla montifringilla,
I have just stared to take photos of birds to learn some name of them.
I found the name in a Swedish bird book and was surprised - It is not suppose to be here in winter and in summer It does not live in this area of sweden. Is there another bird that looks almost the same?
http://mariaberg-foto.blogspot.com/2010/01/blames.html#comments
Qué bonita el ave roja...
What a fantastic post! I do believe I've found a kindred soul here. My husband is a very avid (is that redundant?) birder and since we married four years ago I too am now a birder. I love it, but found that taking up photography has helped me go as long as he does. I moved to a DSLR a couple years ago and need to quit shooting in auto and learn how to use my camera. Thanks for sharing. I wouldn't say you're you're a bad bird photographer, btw.
Post a Comment